Thursday, February 19, 2009

FIVE GOOD REASONS TO OPPOSE H.B. 122

FIVE GOOD REASONS TO OPPOSE H.B. 122
1. H.B. 122 DESTROYS THE CAREFUL BALANCING OF VALUES THAT IS GRAMA. GRAMA
carefully balances two important values of a free society: the right of the public to know what its government is doing and the right of government to conduct public business effectively and efficiently. Since its enactment, GRAMA has allowed government officials, the State Records Committee, and the courts to balance these competing interests in determining whether a particular record should be public or not. H.B. 122 destroys that system of checks and balances
by requiring the public to satisfy an impermissibly high “clear and convincing evidence” standard to obtain access to a wide swath of records involving governmental action of great interest to the public. This change would significantly damage the public’s right to know what its government is doing.

2. H.B. 122 ALLOWS MORE GOVERNMENT SECRECY IN AN AREA PRONE TO ABUSE. When
government exercises its power to take the life, liberty or property of an individual, the need for public scrutiny is at its zenith. The public has a compelling interest in scrutinizing government action or inaction when it exercises such authority. H.B. 122 would significantly impair public scrutiny of such government action by requiring the public to clear an unjustifiably high hurdle
before it could access government records in a wide variety of criminal, civil, and administrative investigations and proceedings, including audit, disciplinary, licensing, certification and registration matters. Because of the high stakes and the potential for abuse, this is an area of government action that deserves more light, not less.
3. H.B. 122 UNDERMINES PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY IN GOVERNMENT. Is it a problem if a local government appears to be turning a blind eye to one of its managers who is found to have regularly sexually harassed subordinate public employees? Is it a problem if the police chief is ignoring the recommendations of a civilian review board established by a mayor to enhance public trust in law enforcement by reviewing allegations of police brutality? Indeed, these are issues of great interest to a public that is entitled to know whether its government officials are
abusing their powers. Both problems occurred recently in Utah. They only came to public light because of GRAMA requests. By requiring the public to prove by “clear and convincing evidence” that such records should be public, H.B. 122 makes it much more likely that records like these will never see the light of day. As a result, the public will have one less check on government and one less tool to hold government officials accountable for their official conduct.
4. H.B. 122 IS A SOLUTION IN SEARCH OF A PROBLEM. The government officials promoting H.B.
122 have offered shifting rationales for the bill. First, they said it was necessary to protect government records relating to attorney-client privilege and attorney work product. Then they said it was necessary to prevent disclosure of records that might interfere with on-going investigations. Finally, they said they are just receiving too many GRAMA requests. Here are the facts: GRAMA already contains exceptions for attorney-client privilege and attorney work product records. GRAMA already contains exceptions for records the disclosure of which would
interfere with investigatory or enforcement proceedings, impair a fair process, or put lives in danger. And GRAMA already contains provisions allowing government to deny requests for non-public records or obtain more time to respond to multiple requests. The overreaching government secrecy authorized by H.B. 122 is not only bad public policy, it is a solution in search of a problem.
5. GRAMA’S PUBLIC INTEREST BALANCING TEST HAS FUNCTIONED WELL FOR MORE THAN 18
YEARS. Those who seek to make it easier to seal off government records from the public ought to at least be able to explain why such a measure is necessary. The proponents of H.B. 122 have utterly failed to demonstrate such necessity. At the House Committee hearing on H.B. 122, a Committee member asked the government official testifying in favor of the bill if he knew of any examples where release of records had impaired a government investigation or caused harm.
The government witness said he knew of no such case. Nor have the proponents of H.B. 122 been able to point to a single example where the public interest balancing test has been improperly applied to a GRAMA request. In fact, the public interest balancing test has functioned precisely as intended by the legislature since it enacted GRAMA 18 years ago. In cases where the public interest in nondisclosure of a record is non-existent or is outweighed by the public interests in disclosure, the record has been released. In cases where the interests favoring non-disclosure outweigh the interests in disclosure, the GRAMA request has been denied. Top governmental officials make the initial balancing decision. Their acts are
reviewable by the State Records Committee and the courts, including ultimately the Utah Supreme Court. With so many checks and balances, GRAMA ensures that protected records are made public only when access truly serves the public interest. The statute works. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.
UTAH MEDIA COALITION
Daily Newspapers/News Providers
Daily Herald (Provo)
Deseret News
Herald Journal (Logan)
Salt Lake Tribune
Standard-Examiner (Ogden)
The Spectrum (St. George)
The Associated Press
Broadcasters
KSL-TV and Radio
KUED
KUER
KTVX
KUTV
KSTU FOX 13
KCPW
Groups
Utah Press Association
Utah Society of Professional Journalists
(Headliners Chapter)
Weekly Newspapers
Beaver Press
Blue Mountain Panorama
Box Elder News Journal
Davis County Clipper
Emery County Progress
Eureka Reporter
Gunnison Valley News
Hilltop Times
Intermountain Catholic
Intermountain Commercial Record
Magna Times
Millard County Chronicle
Millard County Gazette
Moab Times-Independent
Morgan County News
Mt. Pleasant Pyramid
Mundo Hispano
Nephi Times-News New Utah!
New Utah! American Fork
New Utah! Lehi
New Utah! Lindon
New Utah! Lone Peak
New Utah! Pleasant Grove
Orem Geneva Times
Park Record
Payson Chronicle
Richfield Reaper
Salina Sun
Salt Lake City Weekly
San Juan Record
Sanpete Messenger
Southern Utah News
Spanish Fork Press
Springville Herald
Summit County Bee
Sun Advocate
The Wendover Times
Tooele Transcript-Bulletin
Tremonton Leader
Uintah Basin Standard
Cottonwood Holladay Journal
Valley Journal Publications
Draper Journal
Midvale Journal
Millcreek Journal
Murray Journal
Sandy Journal
South Salt Lake Journal
South Valley Journal
Sugarhouse Journal
Taylorsville Kearns Journal
West Jordan Journal
West Valley Journal
Vernal Express
Wasatch Wave
West Valley News
Lisa Bowen
Deseret News, 801-237-2179
bowen@desnews.com
Dorothy Chioda
Salt Lake Tribune, 801-257-8506
dchioda@sltrib.com

No comments:

Post a Comment